<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sunny.Molini &#187; Ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sunny.molini.us/tag/ethics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sunny.molini.us</link>
	<description>Assembled from the spare parts of other nerds to create... the Ubernerd</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:17:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Real Androids in 10 Years?</title>
		<link>http://sunny.molini.us/2009/07/real-androids-in-10-years/</link>
		<comments>http://sunny.molini.us/2009/07/real-androids-in-10-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadget]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://molini.us/sunnysays/?p=502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Director of the Blue Brain Project, claims that an artificial human brain will be possible within 10 years. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://sunny.molini.us/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/45690145_f0013613-the_human_brain-spl.jpg" alt="_45690145_f0013613-the_human_brain-spl" title="_45690145_f0013613-the_human_brain-spl" width="226" height="170" class="alignright size-full wp-image-501" />Director of the Blue Brain Project, claims that <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8164060.stm">an artificial human brain will be possible within 10 years</a>.</p>
<p>I have 1 friend that finds that impossible. He knows worlds more than I about software, so I&#8217;ll give him that. Personally though, while I do think this will eventually happen, I have to chalk this announcement to research grant fishing. 10 years is far enough away to think that anything can be possible, but close enough to think about planning for an investor interested in applications.</p>
<p>Most importantly, the claim is shocking enough to attract discussion of what to do with such a device/mind/person/thing. How much of what we are is based on where we came from? What exactly constitutes sentience? What biases would such a device with experiences of X have verses experiences of Y? Would it be ethical to reformat such a device if its programming becomes unusable to the owner? Would such a device tend toward anything religious in nature?<br />
<span id="more-502"></span></p>
<p>God did not make it, man did. So then if we take that to mean it does not deserve respect, would biological human clones deserve respect? There are decades of literature on this, but these issues still aren&#8217;t resolved. Is it possible these issues still won&#8217;t be resolved when the time comes to interact with such a being?</p>
<p>How would this impact the workforce? I&#8217;ve blogged in the <a href="http://molini.us/sunnysays/2008/01-17/tabarrok-on-the-knowledge-economy/">past</a> about the &#8216;knowledge economy&#8217; and how the truly valuable resource in such an economy is not what you know, but how you use it. In a world of unlimited access to information, sound judgment becomes the resource of value. Will that &#8216;judgment&#8217; be replicable with an artificial (programmable?) human brain?</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Consciousness_Studies/The_Conflict">How do you define sentience?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sunny.molini.us/2009/07/real-androids-in-10-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government is Law</title>
		<link>http://sunny.molini.us/2009/05/government-is-law/</link>
		<comments>http://sunny.molini.us/2009/05/government-is-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://molini.us/sunnysays/?p=307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>“Government is law – law which allows society to grow and flourish. Its terms and specific properties derive from an anterior social reality, not the other way around. It is a set of “ground rules” or agreed upon procedures, found in the course of their history to be reasonable and conducive to the general happiness or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“Government is law – law which allows society to grow and flourish. Its terms and specific properties derive from an anterior social reality, not the other way around. It is a set of “ground rules” or agreed upon procedures, found in the course of their history to be reasonable and conducive to the general happiness or those whom it binds. Even the meaning of the word “liberty” is restricted by these rules.” &#8211; Mel E. Bradford</p></blockquote>
<p><img class="alignright" title="Dr. Mel Bradford" src="http://www.phillysoc.org/bradford.jpg" alt="" width="147" height="181" />When Kant defined “rights” he was basically saying, “There are no divine rights”. I challenge you to find one in The Bible (or any other religious book). All rights are political in nature and not abstract, divine, or inalienable. Jefferson was one of our country’s greatest thinkers, but his words in the Declaration of Independence were dangerously wrong. If we have the divine right to “life” why do we die? If we have a divine right to liberty, why did God allow his “chosen people” to be dragged off into slavery? Remember, the word “inalienable” means “can not be taken away for any reason”. I think that it’s “self-evident” that Jefferson was wrong.</p>
<p>Rights come from political institutions and are only valid for as long as the political institution survives. An example of the real right is the “right to drive an automobile”. The government says that if you obey the traffic laws, pass a test to show your ability to drive correctly, and pay your car taxes it will extend to you the “right to drive a car”. If you fail to do any of those three things that “right” is taken away from you. It even can be extended to economics. If I agree to give the guy at the counter $7.00 at Burger King, he extends to me the “right” to eat his double meat whopper with cheese, fires, and a coke.</p>
<p><span id="more-307"></span></p>
<p>The problem today is that “abortion, homosexuality, and other debaucheries” actually are rights in this country today. They are legally agreed upon contracts between the citizens and the government through legal elections and appointments. If you look carefully at what Bradford is saying he’s saying that those rights are not founded in history or in long held social mores. They are in fact “innovations” that contradict the long standing position of this culture (which was founded on Protestant values that have been held by Northern Europeans for over 500 years). That is why the country is collapsing. With the election of Obama and the liberal democrats, we have thrown gasoline on the fire.</p>
<p>There are three possible consequences to this. First, Obama and the liberals continue to rule for an extended period of time. That will result in the complete fall of this country. The liberal way just doesn’t work. You can’t murder the tax base and work force at a rate of 1.5 million a year and survive very long. You can’t spend future generation’s prosperity into the fifth or sixth future generation without wrecking the economy to the extent that it will take 100s of years to recover. These people are a complete fraud. They parade around with the “peace and love and diversity” motto tattooed on their chest, but in reality they are more prolific mass murderers than Hitler, Stalin, and Mao combined.</p>
<p>The second alternative is the way of the fundamentalist Christians. These people are not really Christians, they’re Pharisees. They worship the rules. Unfortunately, their way does work. It’s only cost is freedom. Frankly, I would much rather have Obama making the laws than Eric Farel.</p>
<p>The last alternative is the way of the founders. Have a set of laws that represent the collective history of our culture. That will never happen. How many people do you know who really understand what freedom really is? Looking at the polls from the latest election, I’d say about three percent of the population. Sadly, that means that the third option has no chance. My best guess is that Obama is the final heartbeat of the left, and the hard right will take over for good. This won’t happen with an election. The left owns the media, the entertainment industry, the courts, the public schools, and the universities. None of those institutions answer to the voters. The change will occur violently, and freedom and liberty will be the final victim.</p>
<p>Now reread the original statement by Bradford. It is in keeping with the views of Burke, Kirk, Weaver, and Adams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sunny.molini.us/2009/05/government-is-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memory Alteration &#8216;Advance&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://sunny.molini.us/2009/04/memory-alteration-advance/</link>
		<comments>http://sunny.molini.us/2009/04/memory-alteration-advance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://molini.us/sunnysays/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Some researchers in Brooklyn have found some chemical that alters the memory storage processes of the brain.</p>
<p>Theoretically, it could be used to someday cure addiction, which is a learned behavior.</p>
<p>It could also be used to turn people into dolls that get rented out for the purposes of paying clients. I so love Joss Whedon.</p>
<p>So if an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/06/health/research/06brain.html"><img class="alignright" src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/04/06/us/06brain.1901.jpg" alt="" width="190" height="259" /></a><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/06/health/research/06brain.html">Some researchers in Brooklyn</a> have found some chemical that alters the memory storage processes of the brain.</p>
<p>Theoretically, it could be used to someday cure addiction, which is a learned behavior.</p>
<p>It could also be used to turn people into <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollhouse_(TV_series)">dolls that get rented out for the purposes of paying clients</a>. I so love<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joss_Whedon"> Joss Whedon</a>.</p>
<p>So if an addiction is re-formed after being &#8216;cured,&#8217; could it become so firmly engrained in the brain that it again becomes uncurable? Might this already be the case in people that have been smokers their entire lives? Sounds like we&#8217;ll need another billion or so for more research.</p>
<p>If it is later discovered that homosexuality is, in fact, learned, might it become illegal to try to &#8216;cure&#8217; it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sunny.molini.us/2009/04/memory-alteration-advance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Madoff&#8217;s List of made-off&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://sunny.molini.us/2009/02/madoffs-list-of-made-offs/</link>
		<comments>http://sunny.molini.us/2009/02/madoffs-list-of-made-offs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 09:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://molini.us/sunnysays/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="wp-caption-text">Charles Ponzi</p>
<p>List of Madoff&#8217;s presumed victims</p>
<p>My favorite is the fact that his lawyer is on that list. He&#8217;s really in trouble.</p>
<p>There is far too little being paid to this issue. Genuine fraud is actually immoral, unlike getting paid a lot of money. I really don&#8217;t understand why people get upset about people who earn a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_147" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 270px"><img class="size-full wp-image-147" title="ponzi_cover1" src="http://sunny.molini.us/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ponzi_cover1.jpg" alt="Charles Ponzi" width="260" height="401" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Charles Ponzi</p></div>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/02/05/madoff.victims/index.html?eref=rss_topstories">List of Madoff&#8217;s presumed victims</a></p>
<p>My favorite is the fact that his lawyer is on that list. He&#8217;s really in trouble.</p>
<p>There is far too little being paid to this issue. Genuine fraud is actually immoral, unlike getting paid a lot of money. I really don&#8217;t understand why people get upset about people who earn a billion a year, but don&#8217;t get upset about a guy that stole $50 billion through cold, hard, fraud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sunny.molini.us/2009/02/madoffs-list-of-made-offs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Freedom 101</title>
		<link>http://sunny.molini.us/2009/01/freedom-101/</link>
		<comments>http://sunny.molini.us/2009/01/freedom-101/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://molini.us/sunnysays/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>I&#8217;ll confess, if you have been reading this blog for a while you may remember this video. I found this video again surfing Youtube and it seemed to me as possibly the most relevant video that I could post for today.
I last posted this video on January 30, 2008, so today is almost exactly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="media"><object width="425" height="344" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/HDRA3XFfDr4&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HDRA3XFfDr4&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /></object></div>
<p>I&#8217;ll confess, if you have been reading this blog for a while you may remember this video. I found this video again surfing Youtube and it seemed to me as possibly the most relevant video that I could post for today.<br />
I last posted this video on January 30, 2008, so today is almost exactly 1 year.</p>
<p>Enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sunny.molini.us/2009/01/freedom-101/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Craiglist Crime Syndicate</title>
		<link>http://sunny.molini.us/2008/10/craiglist-crime-syndicate/</link>
		<comments>http://sunny.molini.us/2008/10/craiglist-crime-syndicate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://molini.us/sunnysays/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>http://news.cnet.com/bank-robber-hires-decoys-on-craigslist-fools-cops/?tag=rtcol;pop

The crook hired people on Craigslist to show up near the scene in a particular outfit while he robbed an armored car and made a getaway using an innertube. Police are still looking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.cnet.com/bank-robber-hires-decoys-on-craigslist-fools-cops/?tag=rtcol;pop">http://news.cnet.com/bank-robber-hires-decoys-on-craigslist-fools-cops/?tag=rtcol;pop</a>
<div></div>
<div>The crook hired people on <a href="http://www.craigslist.org/">Craigslist</a> to show up near the scene in a particular outfit while he robbed an armored car and made a getaway using an innertube. Police are still looking for him.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sunny.molini.us/2008/10/craiglist-crime-syndicate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rat brain powered robot</title>
		<link>http://sunny.molini.us/2008/08/rat-brain-powered-robot/</link>
		<comments>http://sunny.molini.us/2008/08/rat-brain-powered-robot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://molini.us/sunnysays/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>http://technology.newscientist.com/channel/tech/mg19926696.100-rise-of-the-ratbrained-robots.html</p>
<p>A disembodied rat brain interfaced to a computer chip, interfaced to a robot, which moves around the lab.</p>
<p>&#8216;As they do so, the disembodied neurons are communicating, sending electrical signals to one another just as they do in a living creature. We know this because the network of neurons is connected at the base of the pot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://technology.newscientist.com/channel/tech/mg19926696.100-rise-of-the-ratbrained-robots.html">http://technology.newscientist.com/channel/tech/mg19926696.100-rise-of-the-ratbrained-robots.html</a></p>
<p>A disembodied rat brain interfaced to a computer chip, interfaced to a robot, which moves around the lab.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8216;As they do so, the disembodied neurons are communicating, sending electrical signals to one another just as they do in a living creature. We know this because the network of neurons is connected at the base of the pot to 80 electrodes, and the voltages sparked by the neurons are displayed on a computer screen.&#8217;</p></blockquote>
<p>This is strongly in territory of &#8216;unknown&#8217; of the same sort that can be scary. But I can&#8217;t think of any specific ethical issues that I have with this line of research.</p>
<p>HT to <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/08/13/1827215&amp;from=rss">Timothy at Slashdot</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sunny.molini.us/2008/08/rat-brain-powered-robot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

